<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>botWerks &#187; nerd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://botwerks.org/tag/nerd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://botwerks.org</link>
	<description>misc. notes from some dork</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>small optimizations</title>
		<link>http://botwerks.org/2010/03/22/small-optimizations/</link>
		<comments>http://botwerks.org/2010/03/22/small-optimizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sulrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botwerks.org/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#8217;m increasingly impressed with the impact of the seemingly small optimization of adding flashblock to my browser (chrome &#124; firefox).  things are just snappier. life is just a little bit more efficient and my browser interaction experience, just that much better.  sometimes it really just is the little things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m increasingly impressed with the impact of the seemingly small optimization of adding flashblock to my browser (<a href="http://www.chromeextensions.org/appearance-functioning/flashblock/">chrome</a> | <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433">firefox</a>).  things are just snappier. life is just a little bit more efficient and my browser interaction experience, just that much better.  sometimes it really just is the little things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botwerks.org/2010/03/22/small-optimizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>poking at chromium / firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/20/poking-at-chromium-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/20/poking-at-chromium-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sulrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botwerks.org/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that chromium for the mac is close enough to start poking at consistently.  now, i need to find a way to make this honor the default cocoa keybindings and support for ctrl-a/f/n/p + w would go a really long ways towards making me happy. the speed is quite frankly mind-boggling. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that chromium for the mac is close enough to start poking at consistently.  now, i need to find a way to make this honor the default cocoa keybindings and support for ctrl-a/f/n/p + w would go a really long ways towards making me happy.</p>
<p>the speed is quite frankly mind-boggling.  javascript apps scream, rendering is honored appropriately, java support is dicey (keep safari handy) and the interface is really snappy.</p>
<p>this week gives me enough breathing room to poke at the latest firefox 3.6 build as well.  this is the default workhorse browser for 99%+ of what i do.  frankly, i don&#8217;t know what i&#8217;d do without the &#8220;it&#8217;s all text&#8221; add-on.  given the amount of wiki editing and integration with online systems that i have to handle on a daily basis.  if i could get this for chrome, i might be sorely tempted to jump ship.  firefox 3.6 carries with it the attendant hassle of a new release in terms of add-on support.  but fortunately i&#8217;ve been able to hack or cajole all the major ones for me into submission.  there&#8217;s some decided improvement in rendering speed.  but beyond that, it looks pretty much the same to me.  which is more than ok, it&#8217;s a solid performer in the workflow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/20/poking-at-chromium-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>save yourself the $4 &amp; the irritation</title>
		<link>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/06/save-yourself-the-4-the-irritation/</link>
		<comments>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/06/save-yourself-the-4-the-irritation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sulrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botwerks.org/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[don&#8217;t get sucked into buying the augmented reality issue of esquire.  about the 3rd time you hear &#8220;boo-yaa&#8221; from robert downey jr.  you&#8217;re pretty tempted to throw the magazine through your monitor. cute and clever?  yes.  tedious as hell? definitely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t get sucked into buying the <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/augmented-reality">augmented reality issue</a> of esquire.  about the 3rd time you hear &#8220;boo-yaa&#8221; from robert downey jr.  you&#8217;re pretty tempted to throw the magazine through your monitor. cute and clever?  yes.  tedious as hell? definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botwerks.org/2009/12/06/save-yourself-the-4-the-irritation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vonage dial script</title>
		<link>http://botwerks.org/2009/01/13/vonage-dial-script/</link>
		<comments>http://botwerks.org/2009/01/13/vonage-dial-script/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sulrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0xDECAF.net/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[before i dropped vonage a month or so ago for the comcast triple play. i used to use this schell script bound to a quicksilver action to dial my phone. eliminating the need to deal with a pesky phone dial pad. note, this grabs the phone number to dial from your system clipboard. (note the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before i dropped vonage a month or so ago for the comcast triple play.  i used to use this schell script bound to a <a href="http://code.google.com/p/blacktree-alchemy/">quicksilver</a> action to dial my phone.  eliminating the need to deal with a pesky phone dial pad.</p>
<p>note, this grabs the phone number to dial from your system clipboard. (note the use of the pbpaste command.  users of non-OS X platforms should adjust to something appropriate.  i seem to recall the gnome had something similar.</p>
<p>in the interests of posterity.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://0xDECAF.net/attachments/vonage-dial.sh">vonage dial</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botwerks.org/2009/01/13/vonage-dial-script/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
